Colt 1860 Army

"Colt, America's Right Arm"

 "God made man.  Sam Colt made man equal."

I'd been contemplating Blackpowder, Cap&Ball,  whatever you wanna call it, for quite some time.  Then one weekend we saw "Cowboys and Aliens" and the Jeff Bridges remake of "True Grit" back to back, so I just had to get this done.

I found a heck of a deal on an Italian replica "Cold 1860 Army" over at CheaperThanDirt.com and  ordered it and the "starter kit".  Turns out it was the brass-framed model.  While the 1860 was the last model Sam Colt designed before his death, Colt never manufactured brass framed revolvers.    Brass was much more available and workable for the southern states of The Confederacy during the US Civil War days, so many clones and knock-offs of the 1860 Colt saw service, in brass, with "Johnny Reb".

Next, I used some Cabela's club points to get some wool wads, and some "wonder seals", along with some Hornady .454" lead balls.   Black powder is subject to haz-mat so this would be something I should get locally.   A visit to Bass Pro Shops  resulted in some percussion caps and two types of powder:  Goex (the real thing) and Pyrodex-P (blackpowder substitute).  I don't really know the difference.   Both are "not smokeless" and are for use in blackpowder arms.

Finally, on a cloudy day in the woods, with scattered sprinkles, I finally went about loading up and firing.  (I did not DARE take this to a public range, much less an indoor range!   The other stuff is called "smokeless" for a reason).   All the while, the mantra "Keep your Powder DRY" played over and over in my head... while storm clouds teased OVER my head.

Powder-measure set to a conservative 22gr, I went about filling each chamber with GOEX and topping with a wadding.  Next came the balls (swaging off a ring of lead for each as I worked the compressing lever thingy), and finally topped off with a "wonder wad" of waxy mentholatum-scented cap.  These are modern versions of a "lamb-tallow and beeswax" blend which is smeared on the front of each chamber to keep sparks and stuff from igniting the non-firing chambers.  Finally, I put a cap on each nipple.  I took a single-handed "off-hand" stance about 15 yds from my target area, cocked and fired.  The smell was like no other arm.  Kind of putrid.  Not as much smoke as I'd expected, but enough to obscure the target from my view.   A couple more shots and I was ringing the previously-ventilated propane tank with regularity.

Next up came Pyrodex-P at 20yds, and again I was hitting the mark.  Then I punched it up to 30gr of Pyrodex, and at 35 yards easily held off a hoard of aluminim cans, with the  propane tank leading their charge!  I was surprised the sparks and "fragments of smoke" which emanated from the barrel.  While going thru the loading process, I found myself mentally humming a marshal snare drum lick over and over in my head.

Next, for ya'ha's I filled a few chambers to the brim with GOEX, and compressed it well with the wool wad alone, capped the nipples and fired these "blanks" at a tree.  Smoke filled the air, and even curled out of the fissures in the tree bark.

Counting "blanks" and  cap-only hammer-falls, I managed a rate-of-fire somewhere around 25 rounds per HOUR!  I suppose with practice, this could be greatly improved.  But, honestly, I am so glad someone invented self-contained center-fire cartridges, and ultimately smokeless powder with non-corrosive primers.

That evening came the cleanup.  Blackpowder involves water and soap, a concept foreign to those of us who grew up in the non-corrosive smokeless era.  The next morning I found dusty reddish flecks of rust in the chambers.    A quick hit with a bronze bore brush, then a mop with windex stopped all that.   Following everything up with a grease known as "SuperLube 2000" (which is a modern simulation of that lamb-tallow/beeswax blend), and everything was shiny again.   The next day, I removed the walnut grip and fed it quite a bit of linseed oil.   I plan to finish up with linseed/beeswax blend I've been using on all my wood stocks for many years now.

Use and maintenance of cap&ball black powder is a complete PITA (Pain In The Arse[nal?]).  Yeah, I may take it out from time to time, but for the most part, this revolver is far nicer to look at than it is to operate!

M1 Carbine: White Collar Defender

Hopefully, we are all familiar with  Rosie the Riviter. 
Well, she had some white-collar brothers and sisters too.
 
Consider this: What do the following 4 items have in common?

IBM AS-400

Underwood Typewriter

Rock-Ola Jukebox

M1 Carbine

That's right!  The 4th item was made by the same companies that made the others.  Back in World War II, the U.S. badly needed a weapon that was "more" than an M1911 pistol, but more portable than an M1 Garand or M1903 Springfield --  A defensive weapon for troops whose primary job was something other than carrying an infantry rifle.

Top:  M1 Garand, Middle Left: M1 Carbine, Middle Right: M1911, Bottom: M1903

 
The light & handy little M1 Carbine was designed at Winchester, but they could not be churned out fast enough to issue to all the radio operators, artillerymen, MPs, and supply-chain troops who needed them.   Although most M1 Carbines were made by the Inland division of General Motors Company, at least a dozen other companies produced M1 Carbines or their components.  I.B.M., Rock-Ola, Underwood and National Postal Meter are among the business-machines manufacturers who participated.

I doubt we'll ever again see that level of broad cooperation and "pulling together" the U.S.A. experienced at that time.  In fact, to illustrate the pride companies took in their support of the unified effort, I leave you with this ad I ran across some years ago:

Click HERE for larger image

Rosie, meet Emily.

Collection Tracking Software

If you need to keep detailed records of your collection for insurance purposes, or whatever, software can really help.   Sure you could create an excel spreadsheet, or keep everything in a text file, but a dedicated software package on a database is super helpful for recalling specifics.

I evaluated many software packages, but three in particular stood out, and I finally settled one one.  Here's a review of each in ascending order:

• BurnSoft MyGunCollection  - This was OK, runs on Windows only.  It had an area to track ammunition as well as firearms, and decent reporting.  It even has a boundbook (if you need to meet ATF regs, but since the program has not been updated since 2009, I doubt it still passes ATF muster).   If you do not pay the registration fee, the program locks after 30 days.
• MyGunDB - I found this one attractive for several reasons.  It runs on AdobeAir, so it is cross platform compatible (Mac, PC, whatever runs AIR).  The author is an OIF veteran, and is active on Rimfire Central forums, and the CMP forums.  Rumor has it that the Civilian Marksmanship Program will be selling a branded version of this software.   Like BurnSoft's, it has an ammo inventory too, and adds holsters and accessories inventories.  In my opinion, the reporting was not as strong as BurnSoft's.  MyGunDB encrypts and password protects the DB itself, so you could put it safely on something like Dropbox so that its available on any computer with internet access.  The price is right if you have fewer than 10 guns: FREE.  For $40, it'll remove this record limit.  The biggest draw to me was also its biggest drawback: cross-platform is great, but AdobeAir seems to want to update every time I launch anything on it, its UI's are a bit clunky, and well, its Adobe.
• I ended up paying for NM GunCollector .  It is Java-based so its cross-platform compatible, and although it has the typical clunky java UI, the platform is much more stable (updates to Java happen less than twice a year nowadays).   The DB is encrypted and passworded, so I can put both the app and the db "in a cloud" and access it anytime. The reporting is superior to all, except there is no boundbook (I don't need it).  What makes this one superior to all is that it is extremely flexible.  In fact they just call themselves "NM Collector" because you can create all manner of templates:  stamp collections, recipes, whatever.  It's super simple to modify some of the fields within the GunCollector portion to fit your needs.  I'm using it to inventory ammunition too.  I used their knives template and added/changed some field names, and finally renamed the table "Blades".   Now I can enter a bayonet, and in the "Fits:" field, pull rifles that are in the GunCollector table.   You can use the software fully enabled for 30 days, after which it turns off some features (like some reports, sales/purchase records, etc).  But $20 will unlock all that again for life.  You can even purchase it on a thumbdrive if you want to carry it around with you, but there are clear instructions how to install it on your own thumbdrive.

So, there you have it.   Hopefully you can find the right method for yourself to keep track of your  gun collection's details: serial numbers, dates of purchase, photo's etc.   And call me paranoid, but if you have record of arms you sold, that might come in handy if the police ever come knocking regarding a crime-scene gun traced back to you (heaven forbid).

UPDATE:  In Sept 2012, I received the most recent CMP Sales newsletter and both NMCollector and MyGunDB have CMP editions available. See the following URLs:

http://www.cmp.nmcollectorsoftware.com/activate/

http://cmp.mygundb.com

Modern take on M1D and M1C Garand Rifles

The M1 Garand saw modifications involving the addition of a 2.2-power scope in the M1C and M1D models.  These were effectively semi-auto sniper rifles.  However, most sniper rifles of that era were based on the M1903 Springfield bolt action rifle.  Because of the fact that the Garand is loaded by inserting a clip in the top of the rifle, the M1C and M1D models involved a peculiar method of mounting the scope off-axis.  The scope was actually aligned left of center.  In fact, a special cheek pad had to be laced onto the stock so that the firer's eye was kept left of center for proper cheek weld.

In the modern era, I would re-interpret the scoped M1 Garand very differently:

It involves replacing the top handguard with a Scout Rail by Ultimak and mounting a scope on that.  In this case a TruGlo 2x red-dot.  This keeps the scope inline with the bore, but does require a long eye-relief scope (such as would be used on a pistol).   The configuration here actually allows the iron sights to co-witness within the scope image, so if the battery died, the irons would still be visible in the lower quarter of the optic.  One needn't remove the optic in the heat of battle to get the irons in service.

The added advantage of placing a scope out that distance is that the shooter maintains more peripheral vision for situational awareness (hence "scout" rifle).   But for those reasons, it would not be a true sniper rifle.  Probably more along the lines of our modern "Squad Designated Marksman".

And what "sniper rifle" would be complete without a flash hider?  

And finally, here it is pictured with an uscoped M1 Garand with a 10" bayonet.

"Silencers": sinister or neighborly?

In September, I ran across the following writeup, and attempted to contact the author for attribution.  He declined and wishes to remain anonymous.   I have long held that NFA'34 rules are silly, and that exempting noise-suppressors is a first step at repealing/reforming the entire act.  This article lends credence to that, and also explains NFA'34 very well (emphasis in bold added):

In much of Europe they are considered neighborly. In Finland and Norway one can be purchased without paperwork at the local hardware store. Even in the United Kingdom, their use is often encouraged for hunting and acquiring one is relatively easy.
I'm talking about suppressors, "cans," or as long as one understands the name isn't literally true, "silencers." (In Britain, they're known as "moderators.") But while the United States remains the gold standard in preservation of the right to keep and bear arms, these useful accessories have been demonized beyond all reason.
Far from the modern popular and erroneous notion that suppressors were created for organized criminals and assassins, when Hiram P. Maxim (son of Maxim machine gun creator Hiram Stevens Maxim) patented the first suppressor in 1910 his goal was to minimize noise pollution. Ads for the product featured a character called "Dr. Shush" and Maxim himself imploring those at a firing range to "hush," with another noting, "Girls like it when there's no nerve-ripping report." Seemingly obsessed with sound, Maxim's company, Maxim Silencer Co., would go on to make car mufflers and offer consulting services on noise reduction.
While Maxim's marketing may have focused on politeness, his invention's contribution to hearing safety is of greater importance. Most shooters and almost all hunters have firsthand experience with the effects of unsuppressed gunfire and know the results can be dangerous. The average gunshot is well above 140 decibels, the level at which permanent hearing loss can occur. Every responsible shooter uses proper ear protection at the range, but it's not an option in home defense and many hunting situations. And while a suppressed firearm is by no means silent, it does offer protection from dangerous noise levels. In light of this, suppressors should be viewed as safety devices, rather than demonized.
Unfortunately, by the early 1930s some in law enforcement came to fear their possible use by criminals. When the National Firearms Act of 1934 was enacted, "silencers" were included alongside machine guns and short-barreled shotguns. To make sure the average citizen couldn't buy a suppressor, the Congress imposed a $200 tax on the accessory. Considering the average family income at the time was $1,524 per year, it was a highly prohibitive sum.
Today suppressors are legal to own in 39 states, but since they are subject to the National Firearms Act, the would-be owner must fill out a Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Form 4, acquire the signature of his or her chief local law enforcement officer, and submit a passport-size photo to the BATFE along with a set of fingerprints. This information, along with the $200 transfer tax, is sent to BATFE for a rigorous background check. All of the information is then recorded in the National Firearm Registration and Transfer Record, the BATFE database of NFA firearms.
If this process sounds onerous, that's because it is; but despite these regulations there are also 11 states (California, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Vermont) that ban the possession of suppressors outright. Still others allow possession of suppressors, but bar their use for hunting.
Such state laws are pointless, as laws governing suppressors, just as with all other firearm laws, aren't followed by criminals. Rather than purchasing them legally, violent criminals mostly opt for crude homemade suppressors made of materials such as soda bottles and duct tape—not exactly the kind of thing those willing to be registered and pay the $200 NFA transfer tax are interested in.
The strict federal regulations are more than enough, which is why the NRA Institute for Legislative Action has been working to abolish unnecessary and restrictive state laws. In April, Washington enacted a law clearing up a peculiar situation in which suppressors were legal to possess, but illegal to use. That same month, the Kansas and Montana legislatures debated the use of suppressors for hunting, with Kansas adopting legislation allowing for their use.
The most recent blow for freedom was struck in Michigan on September 2, when Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette released a formal opinion declaring the possession, manufacture and sale of suppressors to be legal in the Great Lakes State.
Expressing support for the Attorney General's sound logic were a number of Michigan law enforcement officials. Barry County Sheriff Dar Leaf noted a suppressor's usefulness in helping "keep the peace" between shooters and their neighbors. Others cited federal law as sufficient regulation, with Marquette County Sheriff Michael Lovelace stating, "Noise suppressors are a useful tool for Michigan firearms enthusiasts and the rigorous federal licensing process serves as a safeguard to ensure only law-abiding citizens can be in possession."
An issue like reforming state suppressor laws may not get as much attention as high profile matters like Right-to-Carry laws and UN gun control schemes, but rest assured that the NRA-ILA is working to make sure law abiding citizens can possess and use these useful accessories. By educating our fellow shooters about the benefits and misconceptions of suppressors, we can help bring the remaining holdout states into line with the rest of the country, and the world.

So, let anyone buy a suppressor without regulation.  Then maybe some of these long-established ranges will face less pressure from "imported" residents moving into newly developed subdivisions nearby.   After all, suppressors reduce hearing damage.  And what parent would not want their children's hearing protected?  C'mon!    Its for the children you know.   Or do you hate children?   :)