The subject of wound ballistics has been studied for well over a century now; the sheer volume of data (and debate surrounding it) is overwhelming. But earlier this year a new study came out which takes a practical look at actual shooting incidents. The researcher analyzed incapacitation (or lack thereof) by caliber of weapons involved, number of shots fired and shot placement. Here are some intersting findings:
- .32 ACP had the highest number of one-shot stops within pistol cartridges.
- .32 ACP shootings were the least fatal.
- .22LR, .25 ACP and .32 ACP completely failed to incapacitate nearly twice as often as .380 and up.
- Average number of rounds fired to incapacitate was roughly equal at 2 for all pistols cartridges (.22LR being lowest, and 9mm being highest).
- Across all calibers, immediate incapacitation by shot placement breaks down to 75% headshots, 41% torso hits, 14% extremities.
In a certain (fairly high) percentage of shootings, people stop their
aggressive actions after being hit with one round regardless of caliber
or shot placement. ... in the majority of
shootings, the person shot merely gives up without being truly
incapacitated by the bullet. In such an event, almost any bullet will
perform admirably. If you want to be prepared to deal with someone who
won't give up so easily, ... skip
carrying the "mouse gun" .22s, .25s and .32s.
Now compare the numbers of the handgun calibers with the numbers
generated by the rifles and shotguns. For me there really isn't a
stopping power debate. All handguns suck! If you want to stop someone,
use a rifle or shotgun!
Which brings us back to my opening statement. This study also validates the underlying sentiment of the saying "a pistol is for fighting your way to your rifle".
Check out the full article on this study: http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/node/7866
No comments:
Post a Comment
Leave a comment about this post: